|
The dual range 50mm
f /1.9 Ektar was the more common of the two normal focal lengths.
It was fast for its time, though a bit soft, but the general equivalent
of its contemporaries. The dual range 50mm f /3.5 Ektar was more
compact and was a better choice for sharpness and correction in situations
where there was sufficient light.
Here. in the front view, you can see the layout of the controls, all grouped
on the top deck; from left to right: the diopter adjustment for the viewfinder,
the zoom control for the viewfinder
with a range of 50mm to 253mm, the exposure counter over the viewfinder
window, the selftimer, fast shutter speed selector and slow shutter speed
selector. The shutter release, designed for the left forefinger, was sometimes
criticized, but I've never met an Extra user who found this to be a clumsy
location, though focusing and shutter release require opposite handedness
from today's designs. Then, virtually all film winding was done by lowering
the camera and turning a knurled knob with the user's right hand; there
were no rapid winding features, so Ektra established a design standard,
just not the the current lever arrangement that Leica and Canon adopted
in the 50s. The Ektra with the f /1.9 Ektar weighs 2 pounds, 7
ounces; for comparison a Canon 7 with a similar lens weighs just over
2 pounds. The 1941 price for this Ektar combination was $300.
|
|
A rear quarter view shows
the controls on the camera back. The rear adjustable viewfinder element
provides a focus adjustment for the finder. The lever to the left is for
the unique double-stroke rapid film advance, while the small red ball in
the concave housing is a feedback indicator that is vibrated by the 35mm
sprocket holes as the film is advanced. The knob in the center just below
the viewfinder opens the film back, while the dial below it can be set to
indicate the emulsion that is loaded, particularly important for a camera
with removable backs. Note the close spacing of the split image rangefinder
and viewfinder windows, Kodak's solution to the compromise between the split
image design used and the convenience of a combined, but darker superimposed
rangefinder design. |