|
Photography is an expensive hobby. At some
point, most of us look at our collections of equipment and wonder how
something that started as a relatively modest activity has grown into
an investement that may rival what we spend on entry level cars. Since
I started this site as an exploration of a rational way to get started
in large format photography, I probably owe you an explanation of how
we got to this point.
I'm cheap, I like to tinker, and
I don't do photography commercially. This leads me away from expensive
new cameras and lenses. But gnawing at the edges of my buying habits is
often a question of the marginal utility of newer mechanics and optics.
So in my quest for the perfect 4 x 5 kit, for me, at one point
I bought a Wista VX for about twice the price I would have traditionally
spent on a technical camera.
The path to this purchase included
the following:
- A Crown Graphic 23--a return to my youth--light, excellent 101mm Ektar,
limited standards movements and a fixed back keep this from being a
useful camera for architectural and some landscape work.
- 4 x 5 Speed and Crown Graphics--ditto, but a move up to LF images.
- 4 x 5 Graphic View--Modest, but generally adequate movements, rotating
back, decent extension; at the border of being heavy for field work
done when hiking.
- Kodak Master View 4 x 5 monorail--Rotating,
but non-Graflok back, decent standards movements; too heavy for field
work.
- Cambo NX - Modern monorail, very
available, modestly priced, generous standards movements, rotating back,
gobs of accessories. A nice studio camera, but too large and heavy for
field work.
- Meridian 4 x 5 technical cameras--An early Technika clone with some
surprising features.
- Gowland/Calumet Pocket View--A three pound monorail with full movements
and a rotating back.
While I have developed a growing fondness and respect for the Wista VX
that eclipses my initial comments that had a distinct incremental bent,
I have left them in this form because they address the question that others
coming to this point may ask: "What am I getting for the extra cost
of a Wista (or Toyo) technical camera.
The Wista VX is the simplest and
lightest of the Wista technical cameras, but at six pounds, it is a handfull.
The SP has an additional Micro Focus feature that allows more precise
back adjustment at the cost of $100 or so and an additional pound. The
RF adds a top mounted range/viewfinder. In younger days, I might have
seen these as viable handheld cameras. Since my attraction to large format
work is to increase my deliberation in shooting, the VX was an obvious
choice.
After working with older equipment,
an overriding impression from handling the VX is smoothness. The basic
design is, after all, that of a Speed Graphic of the 1940s. WeeGee would
have been at home with the VX in 30 seconds. In its basic capabilities,
the Wista doesn't significantly improve on the Meridian, save for the
G back on the newer camera. The success of the Wista design is in refining
the layout and features and developing useful accessories:
- While as heavy as the Meridian
and about a pound heavier than the Super Graphic, the VX is more compact,
largely due to its two part focusing rack. This allows a shorter door,
which improves its ability to host short lenses.
- The front standard uses supports
tilts, swings, shifts and rise/fall. Front shift is generous and smooth.
Tilt can be controlled by a friction adjustment knob and includes both
back and forward movement. Rise uses a knob-controlled rack (much like
the design of the Meridian and the Graphic View) and fall is allowed
by a dropped bed. The dropped bed arrangement to get fall suffers, as
all press and technical cameras do, in that the compensating front backward
tilt required to bring the lens back to vertical pretty much excludes
doing anything with front tilt adjustments. All of these movements are
sufficient for all but the most challenging view camera assignments.
- Rear axis swings are not universal
in technical cameras; Wista has designed a mechanism that allows the
case to swing. A locking lever is released and the body is rotated on
its vertical axis with finger pressure. On the VX, rear swing has no
micro adjustment. The rear swing adjustment on the Wistas is mechanically
similar to the front swing adjustment, which is a very different design
than that used on Technikas or the Horseman FA which combine rear swing
and rear tilt movements.
- Rear forward tilt is in effect
a movement that partially closes the case and locks its position with
the mechanisms that secure the bed in any of several positions. Rear
back tilt has two detent positions.
- The VX will focus lenses as short
as 65mm on flat boards. Part of its friendliness to short lenses results
from the overlapping two part rack which allowed Wista designers to
shorten the bed. My VX came from Japan; the manual is in Japanese and
an uneasy English. I believe it says that vignetting is a possibility
with 65mm lenses, but that this can be overcome by using slight rise.
- The 4 x 5 groundglass protector/viewing
hood on the Wistas is attached to a side bracket and can be swung away
or removed for direct groundglass access.
|
|
|
The VX is quick to
set up, though users of older American press cameras have to readjust
to the idea that the bed doesn't just drop down and lock into place at
the 90° default location. Two large locking knobs at the bottom of
the case lock the angle of the bed and this can vary from completely closed
through various degrees for rear forward tilt to 105°--about 15°
of backward tilt. Wista uses the same lensboard as Linhof for the Technika
and this comes as close to any as the standard LF board. Boards drop into
the front standard and lock effortlessly. Short lenses with shallow designs
and small front element can be stored when the camera is closed, but these
tend to be older designs. Of the lenses I might mount on this camera,
only the 80mm and 100mm Wide Field Ektars and the 127mm and 203mm Ektars
can stay mounted with the case closed. The 65mm and 75mm Super Angulons'
front and rear elements don't clear, and both #2 shutters for the 135mm
Wide Field Ektar and the 270mm Raptar are too large. The front element
of the 135mm Fuji is too wide to clear the folded rack. Horseman made
converters that allowed Horseman 80mm lensboards to be mounted on Wistas
and Wista boards to be mounted on Horseman technicals. Chinese manufacturers
currently offer copies of the Horseman 80mm => Wista converters.
Film flexibility is very good. Besides
4 x 5 cutfilm holders and readyloads, 4 x 5 mount 120 rollholders from
Wista and others are plentiful. I especially like the 6 x 12 rollholder
for panoramic work. Wista, Graphic and Horseman rollholders all fit in
the gape of the VX. The sliding back for standard 6 x 7 and 6 x 9 rollholders
is convenient for quick swapping between groundglass and the film holder.
There are two disappointments to the 6 x ? accessory viewing hood for
this back: it is better at magnifying the center of the frame than viewing
the whole frame and it weighs about a pound. I much prefer the Horseman
Rotary back with the Horseman Reflex Viewer and have the 4 x 5 mount version
of this back. It mounts to the G back, but in doing so increases extension
by about 40mm.
The Wista technicals come with a
reasonably good groundglass/fresnel. With either the folding hood or the
folding reflex finder, the image is reasonably bright, even with slower
lenses like the 203mm Ektar f/7.7 or the 270mm f/10 Raptar.
A lot of efficient camera management is
in the details. The VX design that can gracefully accept my Super Angulons,
a 55mm APO Grandagon and 80mm Wide Field Ektar has eliminated a problem
not easily resolved with the Super Graphic. The handy reflex viewer and
the rollback attachment provide some compositional advantages. I am finding
that these features offset the additional weight of the VX, so that the
total weight of the kit is similar to that of the lighter Super Graphic.
Since doing this review, I have added
a Horseman VH to my collection. For an updated view of my ideas about
these cameras: |
|